
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
Watch South Korean startup Innospace attempt its 1st-ever orbital launch today - 2
Surge of off‑lease electric vehicles expected to drive down used EV prices - 3
A Manual for Pick Dependable Vehicle Rental Administrations For 2024 - 4
See tonight’s solar storm unfold across the world - 5
10 Demonstrated Tips to Expand Your New Android Cell phone: A Thorough Aide
Lilly becomes first healthcare firm to join trillion-dollar club, Wall Street reacts
Flourishing in a Cutthroat Work Market: Vocation Methodologies
Millions in JDM Exports and Exotic Supercars Are Currently Trapped at Sea
What to know about the hepatitis B shot — and why Trump officials are targeting it
A throat bone settles it - Nanotyrannus was not a juvenile T. rex
Etymological Experiences on the Wireless transmissions: A Survey of \Learning in a hurry\ Language Web recording
Exploring the Market: Unsold Rams May Be Less expensive Than You Naturally suspect
Vote in favor of Your #1 BWM Vehicles
African Forests Have Become a Source of Carbon Emissions












